In the previous blogpost
I compared the iconographies of Edward the Confessor and Louis IX of
France through a liturgical text most likely written for the latter
and later adapted for the former. There are many similarities between
the two saints, and in this blogpost I aim to highlight one of these
similarities, namely that they both were formulated as martyrs by
some of their hagiographers, despite the fact that they both died on
their sick-beds. It was argued that they had undergone the martyrdom
of the flesh, instead of the martyrdom of blood.
Stoning of St. Stephen, the first martyr, from MS. Stowe 12, Sarum breviary, between 1322-25
Courtesy of British Library
The Greek word
martyr means "witness" and in the early Christian history
this became the word for the victims of persecutions against
Christians, who by dying became witnesses of their faith in Christ.
It was at the graves and for the memory of these witnesses that the
cult of saints grew into existence, and in its first centuries this
cult revered only martyrs aside from the Biblical figures. As
Christianity spread across Europe and became the official religion of
the Roman Empire, few new martyrs were added to the early sanctorale.
There were of course missionaries who met their brutal deaths deep in
the pagan territories, but these were on a far lower scale than the
mass-executions commissioned by Nero, Decius or Diocletian. The story
of the 11 000 virgins massacred at Cologne by the Huns is a later,
10th century, legend and were not part of the pre-Carolingian
adoration of saints (1). Similarly, the story of Amphibalus and his
999 companions - the thousand martyrs of Lichfield - was, in the
words of David Farmer, "[p]urely mythical", although it was
of course accepted as truth in the Middle Ages (2).
Courtesy of British Library
As Christendom
expanded and the Church grew, new categories of saints came into
existence. This was before canonisation of saints became a papal
prerogative, a process that gained momentum first in the 12th century
and culminated in 1234, so the Papal See had little control with whom
Christians revered as saints. The mechanics of the sanctorale's
expansion in the Early Middle Ages are numerous and can not easily be
summed up here, but lay enthusiasm and missionaries' attempt of
bolstering their position are probably two of the most important
reasons why so many saints found their way into the liturgies.
Another key factor was of course that no fixed criteria or procedure
for canonisation had yet been established, which eased the process
significantly. In 1031, for instance, Olaf Haraldsson of Norway was
declared a saint by Bishop Grimkell one year after the king's death
at Stiklestad. The reason for this was that Olaf's body was said to
be incorrupt and that his nails and hair had grown in the grave, and
the cult was promptly established. It should also be noted that with
the establishment of monasticism in the 3rd century and its growing
popularity, the paradigm of the hermit-saint also came into being and
gained significant popularity in various parts of Europe.
With the expansion
of the sanctorale and the emergence of new types of saints,
the divisions between categories became somewhat blurred. Even though
martyrdom was no longer a prerequisite for sainthood, martyrs were
the most eminent of non-biblical saints, and for churches profiting
from pilgrims it was of course most beneficial to have relics from
martyrs, or for kings to claim a martyr's patronage. Occasionally,
therefore, some saints were attempted formulated in a manner which
would, at least in the minds of the devotees, portray him or her as a
martyr. This began already in the early 7th century with Isidore of
Seville's Etymologies. Here he states:
Further there are two kinds of martyr: one in manifest passion, the other in hidden valor of the soul. Indeed, many people, suffering the snares of the enemy and resisting all carnal desires, because they sacrificed themselves in their hearts for almighty God, became martyrs even in times of peace - those indeed who, if a period of persecution had occurred, could have been martyrs.
Further there are two kinds of martyr: one in manifest passion, the other in hidden valor of the soul. Indeed, many people, suffering the snares of the enemy and resisting all carnal desires, because they sacrificed themselves in their hearts for almighty God, became martyrs even in times of peace - those indeed who, if a period of persecution had occurred, could have been martyrs.
- Book VII, chapter
xi, paragraph 4 (3)
Isidore is here
reiterating the idea of the bloodless martyrdom which came into being
already in Merovingian times, i.e. the 6th century (4). This idea
remained in the medieval mindset into the High Middle Ages, and as
the Crusades set its imprint in the mindset of the day, a new saint
paradigm emerged. This was the ascetic and apostolic king who -
unlike the royal saints of earlier times - did not die at the hands
of pagans but lived in accordance with Christ's words and worked to
defend the Church and Christ by munificence and - if need be - by
feat of arms. The new royal saint was a martyr of the flesh, who
mortified his own body and spurned the luxury of the court. The ideal
was Alexis of Odessa, a legendary knight who left his family and
wealth behind to devote himself to Christ (5).
Edward the Confessor receiving the last rites, MS. Ee.3.59, mid-13th century, England
Courtesy of Cambridge University Library
Edward
the Confessor, who had died on his sick-bed and through his way of
life rather than way of death confessed his faith in Christ (hence
"confessor"), was formulated as a martyr
of the flesh after he had been canonised in 1161. Aelred of Rievaulx
touched upon this idea in a sermon held at Westminster in Edward's
honour (6),
while the author of the anonymous Le
Estoire de Seint Aedward le Rei
was the first to expressly refer to Edward as a martyr of the flesh
(7).
While asceticism, contempt of the secular world and a religious
simplicity in things had been well-known characteristics of Edward's
literature ever since the mid-eleventh-century, it was not until
after his canonisation that the martyrdom of the flesh became an
element of his hagiography. Earlier writers had gone to great lengths
in depicting his death and life as Christ-like, but not even the
zealous Osbert of Clare, Edward's first hagiographer, had gone so
far. The reason was probably that Osbert wrote for a papal audience,
very influenced by the Cistercian ideal and therefore sufficiently
apprehensive of the glory of asceticism to appreciate Edward's life
as saintly without playing the martyrdom card. After Edward's
canonisation, however, the main audience for hagiographers was the
English royal court, which naturally did not have any Cistercian
pretention toward asceticism, and which probably needed extra
conviction in order to really see Edward as a martyr. This is
probably also why the anonymous author of the Estoire,
written for the court of Henry III, makes a significant point about
this.
The death of Edward the Confessor, MS. Ee.3.59, mid-13th century, England
Courtesy of Cambridge University Library
The
Estoire
was most likely written around the third quarter of the 13th century.
Several decades later, during the canonisation proceedings of Louis
IX of France and in the early cult, the idea of a bloodless martyrdom
again became an important idea. Louis IX had died from dysentery or fever
while crusading in North Africa in 1270 - his second failed crusade -
and was canonised as a confessor in 1297. The first steps in the
canonisation proceedings were taken already in 1272 upon the
accession of Pope Gregory X, and from 1282 to 1283 the proceedings
were held with interviews and testimonies of people from all walks of
life who had in some way witnessed the saintliness of king Louis.
Among these was Charles of Anjou, Louis' brother and king of Sicily,
who not only advocated the king's sanctity but also that of his
mother and his brothers Robert, count of Artois and Alphonse, count
of Poitiers. Interestingly, the latter was referred to as martyr by
will - martir
voluntate
- and possibly also martyr by love - martir
affectu
- providing Paul Edouard Didier Riant interpreted the text correctly
(8).
During
the proceedings there were also voiced who called Louis himself a
martyr. These voices the archbishops of Reims and Sens and the
Dominican friar Jean de Châtillon. These clerics saw in Louis'
crusade the palm of martyrdom, a sacrifice for which the king had
left his wealth, family and homeland to achieve. This was, however,
against canon and Jean de Châtillon conceded as much when noting
that Louis had not died at the arms of the enemy (9). Consequently,
the attempt to grant France another martyr saint failed.
Louis leaving for his crusade
MS. Royal 16 G VI, Chroniques de France ou de St Denis (Central France, after 1332, before 1350)
Courtesy of British Library
However,
in the first decades of his cult, as the liturgy for Louis was being
established, various camps of devotees emphasised various aspects of
his life and death. The Cistercians were as ever preoccupied with
asceticism and religious adherence, and paid little heed to the
crusades. The Franciscans, however, considered the crusades as the
great renunciation of wealth and the service for Christ which both
lay at the heart of the Franciscan ideal - at least the Franciscan
ideal as it was cultivated at the turn of the 13th century. The
failure of Louis' crusades was a form of passion, the christomimetic
suffering in which Franciscan liturgists saw a reflection of Saint
Francis' stigmata. As Cecilia Gaposchkin puts it: "[C]rusade,
which the Franciscans had been preaching throughout the thirteenth
century, was in a sense the defining event of Louis' life that,
through the suffering brought on by its failure, identified Louis
with Christ (10)". This claim was very expressly stated in the
Franciscan liturgy for Saint Louis, which was modelled on the liturgy
for Saint Francis himself. In the Magnificat antiphon for second
Vespers Louis is, in the manner of Francis, called a martyr by
desire, and the antiphon closes by stating that "the passion
weakened you, but the fervor and zeal for Christ has made you a
martyr (11)".
Louis on his death-bed
MS. Royal 16 G VI, Chroniques de France ou de St Denis (Central France, after 1332, before 1350)
Courtesy of British Library
These
two non-canonical formulations of martyrdom are interesting for
several reasons. First of all they illustrate the diversity in how
saintliness was understood in the Middle Ages, even after the Papal
See had gained control over canonisation proceedings. This is an
important reminder that we can not reduce the past to simplified
representations of norm. Secondly, we see another way in which the
posthumous lives of Edward the Confessor and Louis IX of France share
important aspects. Thirdly, however, we also see that despite a
certain similarity, the rationale behind their respective
formulations as martyrs differ significantly in each case, Edward
being presented as a martyr to the English court, Louis being hailed
as a martyr by Franciscans. These three aspects all point to the
diversity of the medieval mentality and show how things that overlap
at one junction may be separated at another.
Notes
1)
Farmer 2005: 517-18
2)
Farmer 2005: 510
3)
Barney et.al. 2006: 170
4)
Graus 1965: 101
5)
Klaniczay 2002: 156-65
6)
Raciti
2012 vol. 4: 557, lines 129-35
7)
Fenster and Wogan-Browne 2008: 69
8)
Gaposchkin 2010: 30, n.61
9)
Gaposchkin 2010: 31ff
10)
Gaposchkin 2010: 171
11)
Gaposchkin 2010: 173; Gaposchkin's translation
References
Barney,
Stephen A., Lewis, W. J., Beach, J. A., Berghof, Oliver, The
Etymologies of Isi-dore of Seville,
Cambridge University press, 2006
Farmer,
David, Oxford Dictionary of
Saints,
Oxford, 2004
Fenster, Thelma S and Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn (ed. and transl.), The Histo-ry of Saint Edward the King by Matthew Paris, ACMRS, Tempe, Arizona, 2008
Fenster, Thelma S and Wogan-Browne, Jocelyn (ed. and transl.), The Histo-ry of Saint Edward the King by Matthew Paris, ACMRS, Tempe, Arizona, 2008
Gaposchkin,
Cecilia M., The Making of
Saint Louis: Kingship, Sanctity and Crusade in the Later Middle Ages,
Cornell University Press, 2010
Graus, Frantisek, Volk, Herrscher und Heiliger im Reich der Merowinger, Tschechoslowakische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Prague, 1965
Graus, Frantisek, Volk, Herrscher und Heiliger im Reich der Merowinger, Tschechoslowakische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Prague, 1965
Klaniczay,
Gabor, Holy rulers and blessed
princesses: dynastic cults in Central Europe,
trans-lated by Éva Pálmai, Cambridge University Press, 2002
Raciti,
Gaetano, Aelredi Rievallensis
Sermones LXXXV-CLXXXII,
Corpus Christianorum Continu-atio Medievalis IIC, Brepols Publishers,
2012 Vol. 4
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar